cms_UT: 72

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
72 HARRISON POINTE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION 465009 3430 HARRISON BOULEVARD OGDEN UT 84403 2017-06-22 353 E 0 1 WP7B11 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not have sufficient nursing staff, for 6 of 25 sample residents, with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Specifically, residents and family complained there were not enough staff and resident council minutes revealed call lights were not answered timely. Resident identifiers: 23, 43, 53, 55, 80 and 92. Findings include: 1. On 6/19/17 at 1:45 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 43's family member. Resident 43's family member stated that Certified Nursing Assistant's (CNA's) will leave resident 43 in bed because there were not enough staff to watch her. Resident 43's family member stated that she was in the facility on 6/18/17 visiting and as she was assisting resident 43 back to her room, a CNA asked her if she wanted resident 43 back in bed. Resident 43's family member stated that the CNA told her that there were not enough staff to monitor resident 43 when she was out of bed. 2. On 6/19/17 at 1:30 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 23. Resident 23 stated that her call lights was not answered for over an hour on a regular basis. 3. On 6/19/17 at 1:26 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 92. Resident 92 stated that he had waited 3 hours to get a cup of coffee. Resident 92 stated there were not enough staff. 4. On 6/19/17 at 2:51 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 80. Resident 80 stated that he waited 30 minutes to an hour for his call light to be answered. 5. On 6/19/17 at 2:39 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 53. Resident 53 stated that there were not enough staff and she waited for an average of 20 minutes to have her call light answered. Resident 53 stated her husband, who resided in the facility, had to help her get on/off the bed pan on many occasions. 6. On 6/19/17 at 1:26 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 55. Resident 55 stated that she had to wait approximately 20 minutes to have her call light answered. 7. Resident council minutes were reviewed and revealed the following: a. 2/28/17, Nursing: Call lights being answered in a timely manner. b. 3/21/17, Nursing: Call lights are taken (sic) long to answer. c. 5/5/17, Nursing: Call lights need to be answered in a timely manner. d. 5/23/17, Nursing: No concerns. (Cross Refer to F323) 2020-09-01