cms_UT: 26
Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette
rowid | facility_name | facility_id | address | city | state | zip | inspection_date | deficiency_tag | scope_severity | complaint | standard | eventid | inspection_text | filedate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26 | HERITAGE PARK HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION | 465003 | 2700 WEST 5600 SOUTH | ROY | UT | 84067 | 2016-08-18 | 282 | E | 0 | 1 | AV3G11 | **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility did not provided services in accordance with each resident's written plan of care for 4 of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility staff did not assess the resident's food preferences. Resident identifiers: 71, 84, 91, and 179. Findings include: 1. Resident 91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Resident 91's medical record was reviewed on 8/17/16. Review of the care plans developed for resident 91 revealed a Nutritional risk m/b (manifested by) needs assist w (with)/meals/eating, cognitive and physical decline, mood & (and) behavior, restless, significant st (short term (memory) loss in six months r/t (related to) MS [MEDICAL CONDITIONS](gastro-esphageal reflux disease), gingivitis, risk caries & periodontal disease that was developed on 11/18/15. The Goals that were developed included, Will have no significant weight change through 10/25/16. The interventions developed to achieve the goal included, Honor my food likes and dislikes. There was no documentation in the medical record which indicated that resident 91's food preferences were assessed. On 8/16/16 at approximately 2:00 PM, an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM) 1. The DM 1 stated that resident 91's likes and dislikes had been assessed and would provide a copy of the likes and dislikes to the survey staff. (Note: A copy of resident 91's likes and dislikes were not provided to the survey staff on 8/16/16.) On 8/16/16, the DM 1 completed a Food Preferences Interview with resident 91's husband and consultation with the nursing staff. 2. Resident 179 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Resident 179's medical record was reviewed on 8/16/16 On 8/16/16, resident 179's nutrition care plan was reviewed. Resident 179's nutrition care plan included to honor food and fluid likes and dislikes. Resident 179's likes and dislikes could not be located in resident 179's chart. On 8/17/16 at 2:05 PM, an interview was conducted with the DM 1. The DM 1 confirmed that resident 179's food preferences was not completed until 8/16/16. 3. Resident 71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Resident 71's medical record was reviewed on 8/16/16. On 8/16/16, resident 71's nutrition care plan was reviewed. Resident 71's nutrition care plan included to honor food and fluid likes and dislikes. Resident 71's likes and dislikes could not be located in resident 71's chart. On 8/17/16 at 2:05 PM, an interview was conducted with the DM 1. The DM 1 confirmed that resident 179's food preferences was not completed until 8/16/16. 4. Resident 84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Resident 84's medical record was reviewed on 8/16/16. On 8/16/16, resident 84's nutrition care plan was reviewed. Resident 84's nutrition care plan included to honor food and fluid likes and dislikes. Resident 84's likes and dislikes could not be located in resident 84's chart. On 8/17/16 at 2:05 PM, an interview was conducted with the DM 1. DM 1 confirmed that resident 179's food preferences was not completed until 8/16/16. | 2020-09-01 |