cms_SD: 20
Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette
rowid | facility_name | facility_id | address | city | state | zip | inspection_date | deficiency_tag | scope_severity | complaint | standard | eventid | inspection_text | filedate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20 | AVANTARA HURON | 435020 | 1345 MICHIGAN AVENUE SW | HURON | SD | 57350 | 2019-05-09 | 550 | D | 0 | 1 | L4FS11 | **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the provider failed to ensure: *One of one sampled resident (61) was engaged in conversation during three of three meal services. *Two of two sampled residents (61 and 78) were provided privacy during personal care. Finding include: 1. Review of resident 61's medical record revealed: *She was admitted on [DATE]. *Her [DIAGNOSES REDACTED].>-Unspecified dementia without (w/o) behavioral disturbances. -Age related [MEDICAL CONDITION] w/o current pathological fracture. -Hypertension. -Vitamin D deficiency. Review of resident 61's 4/2/19 Minimum Data Set assessment revealed: *There was no Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment score due to significant cognitive impairment. *The resident representative was not available for an interview for her daily activity preferences, and the resident was not able to be interviewed. *She was totally dependent upon two staff for assistance with bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, and bathing. *She was totally dependent upon one staff person for locomotion on and off the unit. *She required the extensive assistance of two staff for dressing and personal hygiene. *She required the extensive assistance of one staff person for eating. Observation on 5/7/19 from 7:50 a.m. through 8:27 a.m. in the [NAME] wing dining room revealed: *Certified nursing assistant (CNA) F and CNA G were sitting at dinning room table four. -They were sitting on opposite corners of the table to assist residents with breakfast. *There were four residents sitting at the table needing assistance including resident 61. *CNA F and G were maintaining a conversation between themselves across the table. *CNA G did tell resident 61 what was on her fork one time. *There was no other verbal communication with the resident's by either CNA during that time. Observation on 5/7/19 from 12:18 p.m. through 12:25 p.m. in the [NAME] wing dining room revealed: *CNA G and H were sitting at dining table four. *They were sitting on opposite corners of the dining room table to assist residents with lunch *There were four resident's sitting at the table needing assistance including resident 61. *CNA G and H were maintaining a conversation between the themselves, from across the table. *No observations were made of staff talking to the residents during that time. Interview on 5/9/19 at 9:14 a.m. with CNA F revealed: *It was normal for her to talk to the residents about what they were eating when she was assisting them. *She explained to them what they were eating and when she was giving them a bite. *She did not typically engage in conversations with other staff members sitting at the tables. Interview on 5/9/19 at 9:47 a.m. with CNA G revealed: *She told the residents what was on their plates when assisting them with eating. *She would watch the resident's facial expressions to know likes and dislikes. *She would offer fluids after two bites of food. *She did not typically engage in conversation with with other staff while assisting residents to eat. Interview on 5/9/19 at 9:52 a.m. with the director of nursing (DON) revealed: *The expectation was for the CNAs to interact with the residents when they were assisting them with their meals. *It was not acceptable to have minimal interaction with residents and conduct a conversation among themselves. 2. Observation on 5/8/19 from 8:16 a.m. until 8:23 a.m. of resident 61 revealed: *Licensed practical nurse (LPN) N entered her room after knocking on the door, and resident 61 was laying in bed. *LPN N elevated head of her bed, and then swabbed out her mouth. *LPN N had not provided privacy for her. The door was not closed, and the curtains were left open. *CNA F entered the room with her breakfast tray. *CNA F was standing next to her bed assisting her with eating breakfast. *CNA F stood next to her bed until she left the room [ROOM NUMBER] minutes after entering the room. Interview on 5/9/19 at 10:22 a.m. with the DON regarding resident 61 revealed: *LPN N should have provided privacy for the resident when she performed oral care. *CNA F should not have stood over the resident to assist her with eating. Surveyor: 3. Observation on 5/07/19 at 8:54 a.m. of resident 78 revealed: *The DON and CNA M assisted the resident to the restroom using the mechanical standing lift. *The curtain had not been pulled around her roommate's bed, and the bathroom door had not been closed. *Her roommate was resting in her bed. *Her roommate could have watched her while: -Staff exposed her while in the standing lift. -Being transferred to the toilet. -Sitting on the toilet. -Staff had provided perineal care that would have been visible to the roommate or anyone else that could have entered the room. Surveyor Interview on 5/8/19 at 8:54 a.m. with the DON regarding the above observation of resident 78: *The curtain should have been pulled or the bathroom door should have been closed. *She agreed the roommate could have seen someone using the restroom if the curtain was not pulled, or the door was not closed. Review of the provider's 3/31/17 Quality of Life - Dignity policy revealed: Staff shall promote, maintain and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures. | 2020-09-01 |