cms_OR: 1

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
1 LAURELHURST VILLAGE 385010 3060 SE STARK STREET PORTLAND OR 97214 2019-02-27 558 D 1 1 71NL11 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** > Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide a trapeze needed for bed mobility for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#38) reviewed for accommodation of needs. This placed residents at risk of ADL decline. Findings include: Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on ,[DATE] with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. According to the 1/2019 Admission Nursing Data Base, the resident was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation in order to better care for her/himself. A physician's orders [REDACTED]. A 1/5/19 Progress Note identified the trapeze was installed on her/his bed and the resident was moving well with trapeze in bed. On 2/1/19, the resident moved to a new room on a different floor of the facility. On 2/20/19 at 11:30 AM, the resident was observed in bed with bilateral quarter side rails at the head of the bed. No trapeze was in place. On 2/22/19 at 7:44 AM, the resident was again observed in bed with a trapeze placed at the head of the bed. Resident 38 stated she/he had just received the trapeze. When interviewed on 2/25/19 at 11:05 AM, the resident stated she/he appreciated the use of the trapeze as it allowed her/him to move more and reposition in bed. Resident 38 further stated you needed to be persistent at the facility and become the squeaky wheel to get what you needed. It took a while to get the trapeze. In a 2/26/19 interview at 1:36 PM, Staff 10 (Resident Care Manager-LPN), stated the trapeze order was initially missed and then maintenance did not think they could use the trapeze with the position of the bed. According to Staff 10, there was miscommunication between staff which delayed the delivery of the trapeze to the room. 2020-09-01