cms_NM: 92

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
92 RIO RANCHO CENTER 325033 4210 SABANA GRANDE SE RIO RANCHO NM 87124 2017-02-14 285 E 0 1 R9L211 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of PASRR (preadmission screening and resident review) screening for 2 (R #125 and 230) of 5 (R's #1, 25, 56, 125 and 230) residents reviewed for PASRR screening. This deficient practice had the potential to prevent residents from receiving the necessary outside services to attain/maintain the highest level of psychosocial well-being. The findings are: [NAME] On 02/14/17 at 8:21 am, during an interview the Admissions Director she stated the following: 1. If a resident meets the level II PASRR the agency will give an okay over the phone and if requested then a letter will be sent to the facility. The PASRR paperwork is usually completed at the hospital or if not a hospital then from the community. 2. The facility has liaisons that are in the community who will go and make sure the forms are completed and correct before the resident leaves the hospital. 3. Once all the information is gathered it is sent to the Developmental Disabilities Supports Division (PASRR) for review. 4. If the resident does qualify for services through the PASRR department the facility will receive a letter stating so. 5. R #125 was not a level II PASRR per the documentation received from the hospital and the interview done at the facility. She received a letter stating that R #125 was not a level II. 6. R #230's medical record indicated that the resident came from the hospital with the PASRR paperwork but it didn't reflect a qualifying diagnosis. 7. She had to do a correction for R #230 and submit it to the PASRR Department and then an evaluation would be done by a doctor from the department. 8. All staff covering for admissions is trained on completing the proper paperwork and submitting it, there is someone on duty that can handle the situation when PASRR is in question. B. On 02/14/17 at 9:17 am, during an interview with PASRR worker, she stated that R #230 was admitted to the facility without prior approval from PASRR. Her office discovered that he had a [MEDICAL CONDITION] disorder before the age of 22. The PASRR worker stated she had a conversation with R# 230's mother and she informed them (PASSR) that he has had [MEDICAL CONDITION] since age 13. C. On 02/14/17 at 9:21 am, during an interview with PASRR worker, she stated that according to R #230's paperwork, [MEDICAL CONDITION] are listed on the form and this should have been a flag to the facility. As for R #125 the office received level I. R #125 was admitted on [DATE] with the [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. The facility failed to notify PASRR that R #125 was admitted and a Level I PASRR call was not received. 2020-09-01