cms_AL: 31
Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette
rowid | facility_name | facility_id | address | city | state | zip | inspection_date | deficiency_tag | scope_severity | complaint | standard | eventid | inspection_text | filedate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
31 | EASTVIEW REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE CENTER | 15014 | 7755 FOURTH AVENUE SOUTH | BIRMINGHAM | AL | 35206 | 2018-01-25 | 676 | D | 0 | 1 | I9JH11 | **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, observations, medical record review, and a review of Fundamentals of Nursing Chapter 28 the facility failed to ensure palm guards were applied to Resident Identifier (RI) #32's hands as directed by physician's orders [REDACTED].#32 with a call bell he/she could activate if assistance is needed. These deficient practices affected one of one residents sampled for rehabilitation and restorative. Findings Include: A review of Potter and Perry Fundamentals of Nursing with a copyright of (YEAR) Chapter 28 Immobility, page 408 and 414 documented: . Nurses intervene to maintain maximum Range of Motion (ROM) in unaffected joints and . collaborate with physical therapists to design interventions to strengthen affected muscles, and joints . Fingers and Thumb. The ROM in the fingers and thumb enables a patient to perform Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and activities requiring fine-motor skills . Resident Identifier (RI) #32 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. A review of RI #32's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 01/01/2018 revealed RI #32's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Section G of the MDS, for Functional Status documented RI #32 was totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL) and Range of Motion (ROM) upper extremity impairment on both sides. A review of RI #32's (MONTH) (YEAR) Physician order [REDACTED]. On 01/24/18 at 10:05 AM, RI #32's call button was secured to the gown. RI #32 was asked if he/she could push the call button. RI #32 attempted to push the call button but could not due to bilateral contractures to hands. RI #32 was observed not having palm guards in his/her hands. On 01/24/18 at 12:30 PM, RI #32 was observed not having palm guards in his/her hands. On 01/25/18 03:30 PM, the surveyor and Employee Identifier (EI) #3 Registered Nurse (RN) Unit Manager to RI #32's room assess hands. EI #3 attempted to open the fingers on bilateral hands with no success. EI #3 was asked if there were palm guards in RI #32's hands bilaterally. EI #3 said no. On 01/25/18 at 02:56 PM, an interview was conducted with EI #3, Registered Nurse/Unit Manager. EI #3 was asked what did the (MONTH) Physician order [REDACTED]. EI #3 said to have the palm guards to bilateral hands. EI #3 was asked why should RI #32 have the palm guards. EI #3 said for contracture management. EI #3 was asked who was responsible to ensure RI #32 had the palm guards per Physician order. EI #3 said the nurse. EI #3 was asked if the Physician order [REDACTED].#3 said no. On 01/25/18 at 03:00 PM, EI #3 to RI #32's room with the surveyor. EI #3 asked RI #32 to push the call button. RI #32 was unable to push the call button due to hands being contracted. EI #3 was asked how did RI #32 make the staff aware when he/she needed something. EI #3 said RI #32 would call out or the roommate would let someone know. EI #3 said she should have gotten RI #32 another type of call button that he/ she could use. EI #3 was asked why could RI #32 not push the call button. EI #3 said because of the hand contractures. EI #3 asked what was the potential harm in RI #32 not being able to push the call button. EI #3 said it puts RI #32 at risk for aspiration and danger. | 2020-09-01 |